Novel solutions to old problems: improving the reliability of emergency equipment provision in critical care using accessible digital solutions.

Reliable provision of emergency equipment in Critical Care is key to ensure patient safety during medical emergencies and transfers. A problem was identified in incident reports and external inspections of processes that ensured the provision of such equipment for use by critical care teams in non-critical care areas in the form of grab bags. A comprehensive project was undertaken to tackle this including the provision of a bespoke digital system.Existing systems were reliant on staff remembering to check equipment and document checks on paper and there was no formal ability to hand over ongoing problems. A local project management approach, '7 Steps to Quality Improvement', which integrated many of the philosophies and tools from Healthcare Improvement was used. A bespoke digital system was designed and implemented with integrated improvements in equipment stocking ergonomics.The reliability of documented equipment checks improved significantly, there was a significant reduction in the number of incident reports regarding emergency equipment and the time spent by staff doing equipment checks was reduced substantially with significant cost and resource improvements. This was so successful the format has been rapidly translated and spread to other areas such as operating theatres' difficult airway trolleys.Undertaking a structured quality improvement approach, using appropriate stakeholder engagement, digitalisation of systems and improvements in basic system ergonomics can have a substantial impact on the reliability and safety of emergency equipment provided for use by members of the critical care team.

Navigating the shifting sands of filtering facepiece respirator provision during the COVID-19 pandemic: a system response for maximising staff safety.

INTRODUCTION: Personal protective equipment is essential to protect health workers and patients and to ensure confidence when dealing with aerosolised disease transmission. We describe the process for ensuring adequate filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) qualitative fit testing at a local level during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Cascaded training is described, which allowed rapid spreading of the testing process, with supervision allowing quality assurance throughout. Testing consisted of subjective 'fit checking', checking for leaks, followed by qualitative hood testing. RESULTS: The original respirators (3M 1870) had a hood test pass rate of 87.5%. Following identification of this as a non-renewable and unsustainable option, a domestically manufactured and sustainable Help-It P2 duckbill-type respirator was adopted as the primary FFR. The hood test pass rate for this respirator was only 54%. A third respirator was made available (3M 1860), with a high pass rate of 80% but also a limited and non-renewable resource. Algorithms were constructed highlighting different proportional use of the respirators depending on the most limited resource. CONCLUSION: The testing format used is simple, reproducible and can be used by any hospital organisation when occupational health and safety departments are unable to provide the service during overwhelming demand. Qualitative fit testing is a scalable and effective method for ensuring appropriately sized and shaped FFRs, minimising resource consumption in the process. The use of a product with appropriate filtration capacity but a lower fit test pass rate (domestic duckbill respirator) as a replaceable resource facilitated adequate respirator availability for staff that would otherwise not have been possible. The provision of an FFR fit registry allows an organisation to make appropriate respirators available to staff from different sources as supply and demand changes.